![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2c24ea0a-b8d3-4fa1-900b-9962a0c26aa5_1_201_a.jpeg?w=1024)
ST PETER & ST PAUL . KIMPTON . HANTS
GRADE I † C13, C14, C15, C18; C19 works & restorations. Cruciform, with a south aisle to the nave, south porch, and western tower. Single cell nave and chancel of c1220. Blocked north door in the nave. Unusual C19 2-stage tower is pleasingly incongruous. 6m W of Andover, just N of the dread A303. 51.2181 / -1.5988 / SU281466
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/fig293.gif?w=1000)
DIALS
BSS records from 2013 are based on a survey in 1995 which mentioned 2 dials quite close to each other on SE angle of S transept. For both dials BSS notes: Known only from reference. No other details. No longer extant.
ARG made the original record on his visit in July 1925, noting one dial and a doubtful one, both on the SE angle of S transept. His descriptions are as follows:
DIAL 1. On the large quoin on SE angle of S transept... late C14. He described it as an imperfect dial, with some lines LLQ, 4 of which ended in pocks; and some pocks LRQ with 2 lines extending beyond them.
DIAL 2. Noted as close-by and slightly doubtful, with a very small style hole and perhaps 3 lines on the lower half.
I found nothing to match ARG’s descriptions but I did find a plausible and a doubtful dial in the same general area.
DIAL 1
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/c148358a-7e28-4ca8-9005-cc5df6d15c02_1_201_a.jpeg?w=1024)
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/43663c2d-37ba-4e8c-a9fe-b47657dd8644_1_201_a.jpeg?w=1024)
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/cd7a64b7-7f13-452f-9ff0-5c6dbd6b42aa_1_201_a-1.jpeg?w=1024)
This stone doesn’t match the others in the immediate vicinity, and gives the distinct impression that it has been relocated and probably resized to fit. I think it plausible to claim this as a crude and eroded dial with traces of stubby lines in the noon area. It looked quite convincing on the day. Possibly it was relocated to a more prominent position, whether as a working dial or perhaps as a decorative quirk.
DIALS 1 & 2 – LOCATION
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/img_7410.jpg?w=1024)
DIAL 2
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/img_7414.jpg?w=1024)
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/img_7426.jpg?w=768)
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/img_7426-copy.jpg?w=1024)
This design is on a long stone close to Dial 1. Image 1 shows the stone as it is, horizontal. The 4 graduated dents caught my eye, being clearly created for a reason. There’s a slight curve to them; and a patch of cement that may (as elsewhere) fill a gnomon hole. Also – revealed in close-up – there is undeniably a deliberate thin straight line that comes directly from the hole (if it is / was one).
Rotating a photo of a dial can be useful in interpreting it (Images 2 & 3). A 90º turn here reveals a slightly more meaningful dial design. That said, to work as a dial stone, the long horizontal block would have had to be relocated from a place where it was vertical.
![](https://gaudiumsubsole.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/kimpton-church-print-bho.gif?w=1000)
GSS Category: Scratch Dial; Mass Dial; Medieval Sundial
All photos: Keith Salvesen